TIGTA Launches New Website The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), J. Russell George, announced a redesign of the agency’s website, to better serve the public.According to Inspector General George, "t...
How long are you required to keep tax returns and supporting documents according to the IRS?
Record Retention for Tax Returns and Supporting Documents
According to the IRS Publication 583, you should retain any records that support an income item or deduction on a tax return until the time when the return can no longer be amended to claim a credit or refund or the IRS can assess additional tax.
Period of Limitations
IF you...
THEN the period of retention (# of years after the return is filed) is...
1. Owe additional tax and situations (2), (3), and (4), below, do not apply to you
3 years
2. Do not report income that you should report and it is more than 25% of the gross income shown on the return
6 years
3. File a fraudulent return
Keep indefinitely
4. Do not file a return
Keep indefinitely
5. File a claim for credit or refund after you filed your return
Later of: 3 years or 2 years after tax was paid
6. File a claim for a loss from worthless securities or a bad debt deduction
7 years
7.Employment tax records
4 years after tax is due or paid (whichever is later)
Above Table from IRS Publication 583 (1/2007), Starting a Business and Keeping Records & IRS Publication 552 (4/2005), Recordkeeping for Individuals
Before discarding any documents, ask yourself these questions.
1.Is this document connected to an asset?If the document does relate to property that you still have, you should keep the document for depreciation, amortization, or depletion deduction purposes as well as aiding you in figuring gain or loss on the sale or disposition of the property.If you no longer have the asset, you should keep the records for that asset until the period of limitations expires for the year in which you disposed of the asset.
2.Is this document needed for other non-tax purposes?You may be required by a creditor or insurance company to retain a document long after the IRS retention period.
Includes Standard Deductions, Personal Exemptions and Mileage Rates
Individual Capital Gains Rate
Individual capital gains rate can vary from 5% to 28% depending upon the type of capital gain property sold, the holding period, the date acquired and the regular tax bracket the taxpayer falls within.Certain dividend income is also taxed at capital gains rates.See your tax consultant.
Standard Deductions
Single
$5,000
Joint Filers
$10,000
Joint, Filing Separately
$5,000
Heads of Households
$7,300
Personal Exemptions
Exemption Amount- $3,200
The exemption amount is reduced by approximately 2% for each $2,500 by which the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds:
Single taxpayers
$145,950
Married filing jointly and qualified widows and widowers
Includes information on Corporate Rates, MACRS Percentages, Estate and Trust Income Rates, FICA, Benefit Limitations, and Social Security Retirement Wage Limits.
Corporate Federal Tax Rates
Corporate Federal Tax Rates 2005 - 2008
Taxable Income
Tax
% on Excess
0
0
15%
50,000
7,500
25%
75,000
13,750
34%
100,000
22,250
39%
335,000
113,900
34%
10,000,000
3,400,000
35%
15,000,000
5,150,000
38%
18,333,333
6,416,667
35%
MACRS Percentages
(with half year convention)
Year
5-year Property
7-year Property
1
20.00%
14.29%
2
32.00%
24.49%
3
19.20%
17.49%
4
11.52%
12.49%
5
11.52%
8.93%
6
5.76%
8.92%
7
--
8.93%
8
--
4.46%
FICA
Year
Maximum Salary
Rate
2008
Social Security
$102,000
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2007
Social Security
$97,500
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2006
Social Security
$94,200
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
2005
Social Security
$90,000
6.20%
Medicare
No max
1.45%
Self-employed individuals pay both the employee and employer portion
but get a deduction for the employer portion.
In 2008, total wages paid to household employees of at least $1,600 are subject to FICA taxes.
In 2007, total wages paid to household employees of at least $1,500 are subject to FICA taxes.
Benefits Limitations
Year
401(k) Contribution Limit (Below Aged 50)
401(k)
Contribution Limit (Age 50 or Higher)
Defined Contribution Plan Limit
Compensation Limit for Calculating Plan Contributions
Defined Benefit Plan Limit
2008
$ 15,500
$ 20,500
$ 46,000
$ 230,000
$ 185,000
2007
$ 15,500
$ 20,500
$ 45,000
$ 225,000
$ 180,000
2006
$ 15,000
$ 20,000
$ 44,000
$ 220,000
$ 175,000
2005
$ 14,000
$ 18,000
$ 42,000
$ 210,000
$ 170,000
Social Security Earnings Limit for 2008
When You Reach Full Retirement Age (FRA)
Amount You Can Earn
If Your Earnings Exceed The Limit
If you are under FRA for all of 2008
$13,560
$1 of benefits is withheld for every $2 you earn above $13,560.
If you attain FRA in 2008
$36,120 before the month in which you attain FRA
$1 of benefits is withheld for every $3 you earn above $36,120.
Let's Take a Look at Social Security
Presented to The Conversation
May 26, 2005
by DeWitt T. Hisle
What Would FDR Think?
by DeWitt T. Hisle
Presented to The Conversation on May 26, 2005
In 1935, 70 years ago, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act.Monthly payments began in 1940.He said:
“We have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against a poverty ridden old age.”
Social Security
Social Security is often described as the most popular government program, and Americans collectively have come to rely on it for their retirement years.But the long-term viability of Social Security must be addressed in the very near future.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants strongly urges that, before taking a position on a possible solution to the funding shortfall, policymakers and the public need to gain a clear understanding of the issues involved in reforming Social Security.The goal of my discussion is to provide some facts and analysis.
Social Security is Not Broke
Social Security Administrations best guess assumptions:
·The Trust Fund surplus will peak in 2028.
·It will decline steadily until 2042 at which time it will be exhausted.
·Inadequate funds do not mean zero benefits:
·Full benefits through 2042.
·Thereafter scheduled benefits would have to be reduced by 27%.
·In 2078 benefits would be reduced by 32%.
Although best guess assumptions are reasonable there is uncertainty about actual results.
·High cost assumptions Trust Fund peaks in 2021 completely depleted by 2031.
·Low cost assumptions Trust Fund would not be depleted and there is no long term problem.
Some Solutions
This Social Security “deficit” could be funded by:
·An immediate infusion of $3.54 trillion.
·By increasing the payroll tax from its current level of 12.4% to 14.3%.
·Reducing current scheduled benefits by 12.6%.
·Improving the rate of return on investments.
·Raise the cap on income subject to the tax.
QUESTIONS FOR EVALUATING PERSONAL ACCOUNT PROPOSALS
Among the most important issues to consider under any personal account proposal are the following:
·To what degree, and over what period, would benefits under the existing system remain in place?
·Will there be a safety net for low-income beneficiaries?
·How much choice will individuals have about:
oParticipating?
oInvestments?
oDistributions?
·Will benefit payments be subject to tax?If so, at what rate?
·What will the plan “cost” beneficiaries in lost traditional benefits as a trade-off for a personal account?
·Should the private accounts be in addition to the basic guaranteed benefits?
AT THE MERCY OF EVENTS
Say you retired in March of 2000 with $100,000 in your private account in an Index Fund.Your inflation-adjusted annuity would be about $680 a month.
If you retired in October 2002 with the same number of shares of the Index Fund it would be worth $60,000.Your annuity would be about $279 a month.
Saved the same – retired at different times – at the mercy of events.
We don’t save for retirement
Workers' savings
Percentage of workers by amounts
saved for retirement:
Less than $25,000
52%
52% < 25,000
$25,000-$49,000
13%
65% < 50,000
$50,000-$99,000
13%
78% < 100,000
$100,000-$249,000
12%
90% < 250,000
$250,000 or more
11%
Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute
Note:Does not add up to 100 because of rounding
Social Security was never meant to fully fund retirement.
POVERTY AND ELDERLY
Social Security is a critical component of the financial security of millions of retirees – especially for future generations of the nation’s elderly poor.
·Social Security provides more than half of the total income for almost 60% of beneficiaries.
·For almost 30%, it provides more than 90% of income.
·It also covers 4.8 million widowers, 5 million disabled workers and 3.8 million children of deceased workers.
·80% of American workers pay more Social Security taxes than federal income tax.
Reducing poverty among the elderly is Social Security’s major accomplishment to date.The poverty rate among the elderly in 2000 was approximately 10%, down from a rate of 35.2% in 1959.Without Social Security, the poverty rate among the elderly would be 48%.
Preserving Social Security matters everywhere, but particularly in Kentucky.Our population is older and poorer than most.In 2003 more than $7 billion came into Kentucky through the Social Security program.Without it 54.6% of Kentucky senior citizens would live in poverty.10.7% do.
Surveys show that many Americans want a safety net.The system they have been use to has security in its name.A lot of people like the ownership society but they want it with a warranty.
Social Security is often described as the most popular government program, and Americans collectively have come to rely on it for their retirement years. But the long-term viability of Social Security must be addressed in the very near future.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants strongly urges that, before taking a position on a possible solution to the funding shortfall, policymakers and the public need to gain a clear understanding of the issues involved in reforming Social Security. The goal of this report is to foster informed discussion by providing unbiased facts and analysis.
The Situation
According to the Social Security Administration’s “best guess” (intermediate) assumptions, the Social Security Trust Fund surplus will peak in 2028. Then it will decline steadily until 2042, at which time the Trust Fund will be exhausted. However, inadequate funds do not mean zero benefits. If no changes are made to Social Security, beneficiaries could receive full scheduled benefits through 2042. Thereafter, scheduled benefits would have to be reduced by 27 percent. In 2078, benefits would have to be reduced by 32 percent. This Social Security “deficit” could be funded by an immediate infusion of $3.54 trillion; by increasing the payroll tax rate from its current level of 12.4 percent to 14.3 percent; or by reducing current scheduled benefits 12.6 percent.
Although the intermediate assumptions are reasonable there is still considerable uncertainty about actual results. Under Social Security’s high-cost projections, the Trust Fund peaks in 2021 and is entirely depleted by 2031. Under low-cost projections, the Trust Fund would not be depleted and there is no long-term financing problem.
Poverty and Elderly
Social Security is a critical component of the financial security of millions of retirees – especially for future generations of the nation’s elderly poor. Social Security provides more than half of the total income for almost 60 percent of beneficiaries. For almost 30 percent, it provides more than 90 percent of income.
Reducing poverty among the elderly is Social Security’s major accomplishment to date. The poverty rate among the elderly in 2000 was approximately 10 percent, down from a rate of 35.2 percent in 1959. Without Social Security, the poverty rate among the elderly would be 48 percent.
Fairness – Economic and Otherwise
Social Security was created as a pay-as-you-go system. Most of today’s Social Security recipients are receiving – and will continue to receive – more in benefits than their actuarial “fair share” based on their contributions. Even if all promised benefits were paid, future retirees, particularly singles, two-earner couples and those with high incomes, will earn below-market rate returns on their contributions.
The rate of return earned on an individual’s Social Security contributions is affected by gender, marital status, and income level. Social policy considerations weaken the direct link between contributions made and benefits received. The Social Security benefit formula includes a declining fraction of income in the calculation. As a result, low income beneficiaries benefit from the formula, high income beneficiaries do not. Married couples benefit from spousal and survivor benefits.
Reform plans to create personal savings accounts within the Social Security system would move the program away from a pay-as-you-go social insurance program and make it more like a defined-contribution pension plan. This will result in less redistribution of income (1) from high- to low-income earners; (2) from single individuals to married couples; and (3) from two-earner couples to one-earner couples.
Impact on Labor and Savings
Although analysts do not believe that Social Security taxes have much impact on the overall labor supply, payroll taxes may affect labor supplied by individuals for whom working is not a necessity. The Social Security benefit rules also appear to affect decisions about early retirement and the amount of work retirees plan to perform during retirement.
Increased national saving is a key to increased capital formation, productivity, and long-term economic growth. The current pay-as-you-go Social Security system may have decreased workers’ overall saving rates. The anticipated shortfall in future benefits may encourage workers to save more, but the magnitude of these affects is subject to debate.
Restoring Fiscal Balance
There are four general methods of improving the financial condition of the Social Security Trust Fund: (1) reducing benefits; (2) increasing revenues; (3) improving the rate of return on Trust Fund assets; and (4) other revenue sources, such as appropriating Treasury general funds.
Benefit reductions can be accomplished through across-the-board cuts, means-testing, raising the retirement age, or changing the inflation-adjustments used to determine benefits. Revenues can be increased by raising the payroll tax rate, raising the cap on taxable income, extending the payroll tax to all government workers, raising income taxes on Social Security benefits, and diverting general tax revenues to the Trust Fund.
Investing in Private Securities
If Social Security remains a pay-as-you-go system, the average rates of return on Social Security contributions will eventually decline below rates of return historically available in financial markets. Even if Social Security became a fully funded system, its rate of return could not significantly improve unless the restriction to invest solely in U.S. government securities was lifted.
Investing Trust Fund assets, as a whole, in the stock market could improve Social Security’s financial condition, because – over long periods of time – the stock market generally outperforms the return on U.S. government securities. However, investing in private securities adds risk and increased administrative costs to the financing equation. Further, the potential for large-scale government investment in private equities could result in undue political influence on markets.
Personal Accounts
Under a system of personal accounts, a portion of payroll taxes paid by each worker under age 55 would be redirected from the Trust Fund to that worker’s own personal account. Some restrictions would be imposed on investment and payout options, but the personal account holder could generally expect to earn a higher return on their contributions.
Personal accounts would not entirely eliminate traditional Social Security retirement benefits. However, under most proposals reviewed in this report, traditional benefits would be reduced regardless of whether an individual chose to participate in the voluntary account program.
Benefit Offsets: Workers choosing to contribute to personal accounts would receive benefits from their personal account along with traditional benefits that have been reduced according to the amount redirected to an investment in a personal account. The greater this “benefit offset,” the less attractive the personal account option will be, but large benefit offsets make personal account proposals less costly for the Trust Fund.
Risk Shifting: Personal accounts expose account holders to uncertainty about their future benefit levels because of market performance risks. Although some of this risk can be eliminated through diversification; the rest may be transferred to the federal government in the form of minimum benefit guarantees.
Administrative Costs: The costs to administer private accounts have a large impact on the benefits ultimately available to retirees. For an individual with average earnings of $30,000, contributing 2 percent of earnings to an individual account, administrative costs of 0.1 percent of assets could allow an accumulated balance of $125,430 by retirement. However, if administrative costs were 1.0 percent, the accumulated balance would be approximately $98,000 – a 22 percent reduction.
Funding Transition Costs
Over the 75-year horizon used to score Social Security reforms, the creation of personal accounts by themselves worsen the financial condition of the Social Security Trust Funds. During the long transition to a personal account system, fewer funds would be available to pay traditional benefits to current retirees and near-retirees, because contributions diverted to the personal accounts of younger workers would result in lower contribution levels into the Trust Fund.
Therefore, extra funds from outside the program or cost savings from inside the program would be needed to fund the transition. All personal account proposals considered in this report include transfers from the Treasury general fund to the Social Security Trust Fund.
QUESTIONS FOR EVALUATING PERSONAL ACCOUNT PROPOSALS
Among the most important issues to consider under any personal account proposal are the following:
·To what degree, and over what period, would benefits under the existing system remain in place?
·Will there be a safety net for low-income beneficiaries?
·How much choice will individuals have about:
oParticipating?
oInvestments?
oDistributions?
·Will benefit payments be subject to tax? If so, at what rate?
·What will the plan “cost” beneficiaries in lost traditional benefits as a trade-off for a personal account?
Tips for payroll and human resource record retention, including information on how long to keep OSHA,IRS/SSA/FUTA, FLSA/INRCA, Family Medical Leave and Supplemental records.
OSHA Documents – 5 years
·Log of all occupational illnesses/accidents
·Other OSHA records
IRS/SSA/FUTA documents – 4 years
·Duplicate copies of tax returns/tax deposits
·Returned copies of Form W-2
·Canceled/voided checks
·Employee’s name/address/occupation/social security number
·Amount/date of payments for wages, annuities, pensions, tips; fair market value of wages-in-kind
·Record of allocated tips
·Amount of wages subject to withholding
·Taxes withheld (and date if different from pay date)
·Copies of Form W-4 (for at least four years after the date the last return was filed using the information on the Form W-4)
·Agreements to withhold additional amounts
·Dates when employee was absent due to injury and received payments; amount/rate of such payments (by employer or third party)
·Copies of Forms 941, 940, W-2, W-3, Schedule A, Schedule B, and other returns filed on magnetic media
FLSA/INRCA Record Retention – 3 years
·Name of employee/address/occupation/birth date/sex
·Hours worked each day/week
·Amount and date of payment
·Amounts earned for straight time and overtime/additions to and deductions from wages
·Collective bargaining agreements
·Sales and purchase records
·Immigration Reform and Control Act, Form I-9-three years after date of hire or one year after date of termination (whichever is later)
FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE Record-Keeping Requirements - 3 years
The following records must be kept for at least three years, in any format, and made available no more frequently than once every 12 months for Department of Labor inspection.
·Name, address, occupation rate of pay, daily and weekly hours worked per pay period
·Additions to and deductions from wages, total compensation
·Dates of FMLA leave (or hours if taken in increments of less than one day)
·Copies of written notices of intention to take FMLA leave provided by employee
·Copies of general and specific notices provided to employees
·Plan descriptions/policies and procedures dealing with unpaid and paid leaves
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations excepting certain partnership-related items from the centralized partnership audit regime created by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA), providing alternative examination rules for the excepted items, conforming the existing centralized audit regime regulations to Internal Revenue Code changes, and clarifying the existing audit regime rules.
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations excepting certain partnership-related items from the centralized partnership audit regime created by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA), providing alternative examination rules for the excepted items, conforming the existing centralized audit regime regulations to Internal Revenue Code changes, and clarifying the existing audit regime rules. The regulations finalize with revisions 2020 proposed regulations (REG-123652-18).
Centralized Partnership Audit Regime
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA,P.L. 114-74) replaced the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA,P.L. 97-248) partnership procedures with a centralized partnership audit regime for making partnership adjustments and tax determinations, assessments, and collections at the partnership level. These changes were further amended by the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act,P.L. 114-113) and the Tax Technical Corrections Act of 2018 (TTCA,P.L. 115-141). The centralized audit regime, as amended, generally applies to returns filed for partnership tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. A partnership with no more than 100 partners may generally elect out of the centralized audit regime if all the partners are eligible partners.
Under the post-2017 centralized partnership audit regime, the IRS examines “partnership-related items” of all domestic and foreign partnerships and their partners. A"partnership-related item"is any item relevant to the determination of the income tax liability of any person. However,Code Sec. 6241(11), added by the BBA, authorizes Treasury to except “special enforcement matters” from the centralized partnership audit regime and to issue regulations providing alternative assessment and collection rules for those matters. The 2020 proposed regulations and these final regulations implementCode Sec. 6241(11)and make changes to previously issued final regulations pertaining to the centralized partnership audit regime.
Special Enforcement Matters
Code Sec. 6241(11)sets forth six categories of"special enforcement matters":
(1) failures to comply with the requirements for a partnership partner or S corporation partner to furnish statements or compute and pay an imputed underpayment;
(2) assessments relating to termination assessments of income tax or jeopardy assessments of income, estate, gift, and certain excise taxes;
(3) criminal investigations;
(4) indirect methods of proof of income;
(5) foreign partners or partnerships; and
(6) other matters identified in IRS regulations.
The final regulations add three new types of special enforcement matters:
relationship of a partner to the partnership under theCode Sec. 267(b)orCode Sec. 707(b)related-party rules and extensions of the partner’s period of limitations; and
penalties and taxes imposed on the partnership under chapter 1.
The final regulations also require the IRS to provide written notice of most special enforcement matters to taxpayers to whom the adjustments are being made.
In addition, the final regulations clarify that the IRS may adjust partnership-level items for a partner or indirect partner without regard to the centralized audit regime if the adjustment relates to termination and jeopardy assessments, the partner is under criminal investigation, or the adjustment is based on an indirect method of proof of income.
However, the final regulations provide that a determination about partnership-related items made outside of the centralized partnership regime is not binding on any person who is not a party to that proceeding. The final regulations clarify that neither the partnership nor the other partners are bound by a determination regarding a partnership-related item from a partner-level examination and that neither the partnership nor the other partners need to adjust their returns.
In addition, the special-enforcement-matter rules do not apply to the extent a partner can demonstrate that adjustments to partnership-related items in the deficiency or an adjustment by the IRS were (i) previously taken into account under the centralized audit regime by the person being examined or (ii) included in an imputed underpayment paid by a partnership (or pass-through partner) for any tax year in which the partner was a reviewed-year partner (but only if the amount exceeds the amount reported by the partnership to the partner that was either reported by the partner or included in the deficiency or adjustment).
Imputed Underpayments
The IRS and Treasury believe that a mechanism must exist for including adjustments from a centralized-regime audit in the partnership’s imputed underpayment, even if the partnership elects to “push out” the adjustment to its partners.
Under existing regulations for calculating imputed underpayments, an adjustment to a non-income item (that is, an item that is not an item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit) that is related to, or results from, an adjustment to an item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit is generally treated as zero. The final regulations require a partnership to take into account an adjustment to a non-income item on its adjustment-year return by adjusting the item to be consistent with the adjustment, but only to the extent the item would appear on that return without regard to the adjustment. If the item already appeared on the partnership’s adjustment-year return as a non-income item or the item appeared as a non-income item on any return of the partnership for a tax year between the reviewed year and the adjustment year, the partnership does not create a new item on the partnership’s adjustment-year return.
The final regulations provide that if the partnership is required to adjust its basis in an asset, the partnership does so in the adjustment year; however, the partnership only recognizes income and gain as a result of the basis adjustment in situations in which income or gain would be recognized. The final regulations also demonstrate how adjustments to liabilities are taken into account when they do not result in an imputed underpayment, and how an amended return should reflect adjustments to non-income items.
The final regulations follow the proposed regulations in allowing either the IRS or the partnership to treat an adjustment to a non-income item as zero. The final regulations also permit a partnership to treat such an adjustment as zero if the adjustment is related to, or results from, another adjustment to a non-income item. The partnership may not, however, treat such an adjustment as zero if one adjustment is positive and the other is negative.
Partnership Ceasing to Exist
Code Sec. 6241states that if a partnership ceases to exist before any partnership adjustments take effect, the former partners of the partnership must take the adjustments into account in the manner prescribed in regulations. The final regulations clarify that even if a partnership has ceased to exist, it may make the election to push out the adjustments, request modification of the imputed underpayment, or pay the imputed underpayment within ten days of notice and demand for payment.
A section of the proposed regulations that would define"former partners"is not included in the final regulations and remains proposed.
Effective and Applicability Dates
The final regulations, which are effective December 8, 2022, apply to tax years ending on or after November 20, 2020 (except that finalReg. § 301.6241-7(b)applies to tax years beginning after December 20, 2018).
An IRS Notice provides guidance on the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements that the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ( P.L. 117-169) added to several new and amended tax credits and deductions.
An IRS Notice provides guidance on the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements that the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169) added to several new and amended tax credits and deductions. The IRS also anticipates issuing proposed regulations and other guidance with respect to the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.
These requirements generally apply if construction of a qualified facility, or installation of qualified property in an energy efficient commercial building, begins on or after the date that is 60 days after the IRS publishes guidance. This notice serves as the guidance that starts the 60-day clock. Thus, these rules apply when a qualified facility begins construction or the installation of qualified property begins on or after January 29, 2023.
The notice also provides guidance for determining the beginning of construction of a facility for certain credits, and the beginning of installation of certain property with respect to the energy efficient commercial buildings deduction.
The notice includes examples to illustrate these rules.
Prevailing Wage Requirements
For purposes of the credits, a taxpayer must satisfy the prevailing wage requirements with respect to any laborer or mechanic employed in the construction, alteration, or repair of a facility, property, project, or equipment by the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s contractors and subcontractors. The taxpayer must also maintain and preserve sufficient records to establish compliance, including books of account or records for work performed by contractors or subcontractors.
The prevailing wage rate is generally the one published by the Secretary of Labor onwww.sam.govfor the geographic area and type of construction applicable to the facility, including all labor classifications for the construction, alteration, or repair work that will be done on the facility by laborers or mechanics.
If the Secretary has not published a prevailing wage rate for the geographic area or the particular type of work, the taxpayer may request a wage determination or wage rate from the Wage and Hour Division. The taxpayer must follow prescribed procedures in order to rely on the provided wage or rate.
Similarly, for purposes of the deduction for energy efficient commercial buildings, the prevailing wage rate for installation of energy efficient commercial building property, energy efficient building retrofit property, or property installed pursuant to a qualified retrofit plan, is determined with respect to the prevailing wage rate for construction, alteration, or repair of a similar character in the locality in which the property is located, as most recently determined by the Secretary of Labor.
Apprenticeship Requirements
A taxpayer satisfies the apprenticeship requirements if:
The taxpayer satisfies the Apprenticeship Labor Hour Requirements, subject to any applicable Apprenticeship Ratio Requirements;
The taxpayer satisfies the Apprenticeship Participation Requirements; and
The taxpayer maintains sufficient records.
Under the Good Faith Effort Exception, the taxpayer will be considered to have made a good faith effort in requesting qualified apprentices if the taxpayer requests qualified apprentices from a registered apprenticeship program in accordance with usual and customary business practices for registered apprenticeship programs in a particular industry.
Beginning of Construction or Installation
The beginning of construction is determined under the Physical Work Test and the Five-Percent Safe Harbor established inNotice 2013-29. The Continuity Safe Harbor established byNotice 2016-31also applies.
The IRS has notified taxpayers, above the age of 72 years, that they can delay the withdrawal of the required minimum distributions (RMD) from their retirement plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA), until April 1, following the later of the calendar year that the taxpayer reaches age 72 or, in a workplace retirement plan, retires.
The IRS has notified taxpayers, above the age of 72 years, that they can delay the withdrawal of therequired minimum distributions(RMD) from their retirement plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA), until April 1, following the later of the calendar year that the taxpayer reaches age 72 or, in a workplace retirement plan, retires. The Service also reminded taxpayers that they must meet the deadlines to avoid penalties and that such RMDs may not be rolled over to another IRA or retirement plan. The Service also informed taxpayers that not taking a required distribution, or not withdrawing enough, could mean a 50% excise tax on the amount not distributed.
The deadlines for the different RMDs are as follows:
Taxpayers holdingtraditional IRAs, and SEP, SARSEP, and SIMPLE IRA should take their first RMD, even if they’re still working, by April 1, 2023, and the second RMD by Dec. 31, 2023, and each year thereafter.
For taxpayers with retirement plans, the first RMD is due by April 1 of the later of the year they reach age 72, or the participant is no longer employed. A 5% owner of the employer must begin taking RMDs at age 72.
An IRA trustee, or plan administrator, must either report the amount of the RMD to the IRA owner or offer to calculate it. They may be able to withdraw the total amount from one or more of the IRAs. However, RMDs from workplace retirement plans must be taken separately from each plan.
An RMD may be required for an IRA, retirement plan account or Roth IRA inherited from the original owner. A 2020 RMD that qualified as a coronavirus-related distribution may be repaid over a 3-year period or the taxes due on the distribution may be spread over three years. A 2020 withdrawal from an inherited IRA could not be repaid to the inherited IRA but may be spread over three years for income inclusion.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would implement the beneficial ownership information provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) that govern access to and protection of beneficial ownership information.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would implement the beneficial ownership information provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) that govern access to and protection of beneficial ownership information. The proposed regulations address the circumstances under which beneficial ownership information may be disclosed to certain governmental authorities and financial institutions, and how that information must be protected.
The proposed regulations would—
specify how government officials would access beneficial ownership information in support of law enforcement, national security, and intelligence activities;
describe how certain financial institutions and their regulators would access that information to fulfill customer due diligence requirements and conduct supervision; and
set high standards for protecting this sensitive information, consistent with CTA goals and requirements.
The NPRM also proposes amendments to the final reporting rule issued on September 30, 2022, effective January 1, 2024, to specify when reporting companies may report FinCEN identifiers associated with entities.
Limiting Access to Beneficial Ownership Information
The NPRM follows the final reporting rule which requires most corporations, limited liability companies, and other similar entities created in or registered to do business in the United States, to report information about their beneficial owners to FinCEN. Per CTA requirements, the proposed regulations limit access to beneficial ownership information to—
federal agencies engaged in national security, intelligence, or law enforcement activities;
state, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies, if authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction;
financial institutions with customer due diligence requirements, and federal regulators supervising them for compliance with those requirements;
foreign law enforcement agencies, judges, prosecutors, central authorities, and other agencies that meet specific criteria, and whose requests are made under an international treaty, agreement, or convention, or via law enforcement, judicial, or prosecutorial authorities in a trusted foreign country; and
U.S. Treasury officers and employees whose official duties require beneficial ownership information inspection or disclosure, or for tax administration.
The proposed regulation would subject each authorized recipient category to unique security and confidentiality protocols that align with the scope of the access and use provisions.
Proposed Effective Date
FinCEN is proposing an effective date of January 1, 2024, to align with the date when the final beneficial ownership information reporting rule becomes effective.
Request for Comments
Interested parties can submit written comments on the NPRM by or before February 14, 2023 (60 days following publication in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted by the Federal E-rulemaking Portal (regulations.gov), or by mail to Policy Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. Refer to Docket Number FINCEN-2021-0005 and RIN 1506-AB49/AB59.
The IRS and the Treasury Department have released final regulations that provide some clarity and relief with regards to certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act ( P.L. 111-148), including the definition of minimum essential coverage under Code Sec. 5000A and reporting requirements for health insurance issuers and employers under Code Secs. 6055 and 6056. The final regulations finalize 2021 proposed regulations with some clarifications ( REG-109128-21).
The IRS and the Treasury Department have released final regulations that provide some clarity and relief with regards to certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), including the definition of minimum essential coverage underCode Sec. 5000Aand reporting requirements for health insurance issuers and employers underCode Secs. 6055and6056. The final regulations finalize 2021 proposed regulations with some clarifications (REG-109128-21).
The final regulations provide that the term"minimum essential coverage"does not include Medicaid coverage limited to COVID-19 testing and diagnostic services provided under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (P.L. 116-127). If an individual qualifies solely for this coverage, then it does not prevent them from claiming the premium tax credit underCode Sec. 36B. This amendment toReg.§ 1.5000A-2applies for months beginning after September 28, 2020.
The final regulations also provide:
An automatic 30-day extension of time underCode Sec. 6056for"applicable large employers"(generally employers with 50 or more full-time employees, including full-time equivalent employees) to furnish statements relating to health insurance that the applicable large employers offer to their full-time employees; ·
An automatic 30-day extension of time underCode Sec. 6055for providers of minimum essential coverage (such as health insurance issuers) that would provide an automatic extension of time for furnishing statements to responsible individuals; and
An alternative method for reporting entities to furnish statements to their insured members when their shared responsibility payment is zero. The regulations underReg.§1.6055-1(g)(4)(ii)(B)provide sample language for furnishing these statements.
The regulations underReg. §§1.6055-1and301.6056-1apply for years beginning after December 31, 2021.
The final regulations affect some taxpayers who claim the premium tax credit; health insurance issuers, self-insured employers, government agencies, and other persons that provide minimum essential coverage to individuals; and applicable large employers.
A theme running through the recent Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals Focus Guide for fiscal year 2023 is moving on past the issues created by the COVID-19 pandemic and getting back to helping taxpayers through the appeals process.
A theme running through the recent Internal Revenue Service Independent Office of Appeals Focus Guide for fiscal year 2023 is moving on past the issues created by the COVID-19 pandemic and getting back to helping taxpayers through the appeals process.
"It's time, as we leave some of those pandemic issues behind us, to focus more on our core mission in appeals, which is the quality resolution of taxpayer cases,"Independent Office of Appeals Chief Andy Keyso said in a recent interview with Federal Tax Daily."I think that's the theme you see throughout thefocus guide,"which was issued November 4, 2022.
To that end, Keyso highlighted two key areas that will enable the office to meet that core mission – staffing and technology upgrades.
Rebuilding Staff
On the staffing side, Keyso noted that 10 years ago, the Appeals staff was at 2,100 employees, but in that window dropped to a low of about 1,100.
"We have made a big push to restack, using any kind of approval we could get here internally, and we currently are sitting at about 1,500 employees,"he said, adding that the office currently has about 1,500 employees, with a goal in 2023 to get up to 1,725.
Keyso noted that the office is different from other parts of the IRS that have an exam or a collections function.
"If you don’t have the number of people you’d like to have, you just do fewer collection actions or you do fewer audits,"Keyso said."In Appeals, we have unique challenges. We’ve got to work every case that comes in the door. We can’t say, ‘We don’t have enough people, so we are not going to work your case.’ So for us, hiring is particularly an acute issue and recruiting and hiring will be one of our focus areas for this year."
He added that the staffing targets are based on the IRS’ set budget for 2023 and do not include potential increases that could come with the additional funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act.
Improving Technology
Like the rest of the agency, the Office of Appeals is working through its own technology issues and is in need of upgrades.
In particular, Keyso highlighted the need to get away from paper.
"I think we learned during the pandemic a few things about technology and how paper can really be our Achilles heel when you have to move paper case files,"he said."That was a particular issue during the pandemic when you didn’t have all of your people in the office to ship case files around."
Moving to a more paperless environment is a"continuing challenge,"Keyso said, not only for communicating between Appeals employees, but between staff and taxpayers."Should we really be mailing things back and forth through the U.S. Postal Service? Or is there a better way to communicate with taxpayers that’s faster and maybe preferable to taxpayers?"
As part of the technology challenges, the Independent Office of Appeals also is looking to continue to use video conferencing, something that gained traction during the pandemic.
"With the service wide return to the office, we are again offering in person conferences, which is something Appeals is very excited about,"Amy Giuliano, senior advisor to the Chief and Deputy Chief in the Office of Appeal, said."But we want video conferences to remain a permanent option to alongside in person. We requested comments in August … for people to submit input on experiences they had with video conferences with appeals that should inform our longer term guidelines. And we've received a lot of positive feedback that video conferences, when they're managed effectively, are a great way for a taxpayer to present their case to appeals."
She applauded the fact that video conferences have the benefits of a face-to-face conference in that one can see the IRS agent they are dealing with, but they avoid the logistical issues with traveling to an IRS office to conduct the meeting. It makes things more accessible, especially if the taxpayer has medical or other mobility issues.
"That's why it's so important that it remain an option going forward alongside in person and alongside telephone,"she said.
Improving Overall Access
Keyso also noted that a key area of focus going forward is improving the overall access to the Independent Office of Appeals now that access has been codified into law through the Taxpayer First Act of 2019. Treasury is currently working on regulations that will implement the law.
"Our position in the Appeals Office is, you know, we want the broadest access to appeals possible for us to hear controversies or disputes between IRS and taxpayer,"Keyso said."So we will continue to push for broad access to taxpayers to appeals."
Giuliano added that"enhancing the taxpayer experience is really what sort of animates and informs everything else that we're doing."
Keyso also mentioned that Appeals is planning on continuing convening practitioner panels, during which the office invites practitioners to talk about issues they are facing as they deal with the appeals process. He noted that it was through these panels that the office made changes to letters that went out to taxpayers and their representatives that included more contact information on managers so taxpayers and their representatives have it handy if they need to escalate a situation.
Audits by the Internal Revenue Service in 2017 and 2019 were not conducted to target specific individuals, according to a new report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Audits by the Internal Revenue Service in 2017 and 2019 were not conducted to target specific individuals, according to a new report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Thereport, dated November 29, 2022, but released December 1, found that"key decisions and information related to the tax return selection process for Tax Years 2017 and 2019 were determined prior to the start of each year’s respective filing season and prior to the selection of any returns,"the Treasury watchdog said in a statement."TIGTA also confirmed that the computer program used to select tax returns worked as designed and di not included any malicious code that would force the selection of specific taxpayers for an NRP [National Research Program] audit."
TIGTA conducted the analysis of the audit selection process following a July 2022 media report that suggested the selection for those tax years may not have been random. To answer the allegations, TIGTA hired a contractor that, according to the report,"replicated the process. Specifically, the contractor replicated each week’s original sample selection file through April 2018 and July 2020 for TYs 2017 and 2019, respectively."
Once replicated, a return-by-return comparison of the replicated files and the original sample selection was conducted to verify the files matched.
"They concluded that the tax returns in the original samples were the same tax returns selected when the process was replicated using the respective seed numbers,"the report states."TIGTA also compared the contractor’s replicated weekly output files to the original weekly output files, and same as the IRS, TIGTA determined they matched."
The report noted that a line-by-line review of the original source code was conducted"to determine whether information (i.e., TIN) was improperly coded in the program that would result in a specific taxpayer being selected for an NRP audit. The contractor concluded that no specific taxpayer information was included in the original source code."
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
The Affordable Care Act—enacted nearly five years ago—phased in many new requirements affecting individuals and employers. One of the most far-reaching requirements, the individual mandate, took effect this year and will be reported on 2014 income tax returns filed in 2015. The IRS is bracing for an avalanche of questions about taxpayer reporting on 2014 returns and, if liable, any shared responsibility payment. For many taxpayers, the best approach is to be familiar with the basics before beginning to prepare and file their returns.
Individual mandate
Beginning January 1, 2014, the Affordable Care Act requires individuals (and their dependents) to have minimum essential health care coverage or make a shared responsibility payment, unless exempt. This is commonly called the "individual mandate."
Employer reporting
Nearly all employer-provided health coverage is treated as minimum essential coverage. This includes self-insured plans, COBRA coverage, and retiree coverage. Large employers will provide employees with new Form 1095-C, Employer-Provided Health Insurance Coverage and Offer, which will report the type of coverage provided. The IRS has encouraged employers to voluntarily report starting in 2015 for the 2014 plan year. Mandatory reporting begins in 2016 for the 2015 plan year.
Marketplace coverage
Coverage obtained through the Affordable Care Act Marketplace is also treated as minimum essential coverage. Marketplace enrollees should expect to receive new Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement, from the Marketplace. Individuals with Marketplace coverage will indicate on their returns that they have minimum essential coverage. Because so many individuals with Marketplace coverage also qualify for a special tax credit, they will also likely need to complete new Form 8962, Premium Tax Credit (discussed below).
Medicare, Medicaid and other government coverage
Medicare, TRICARE, CHIP, Medicaid, and other government health programs are treated as minimum essential coverage. There are some very narrow exceptions but overall, most government-sponsored coverage is minimum essential coverage.
Exemptions
Some individuals are expressly exempt under the Affordable Care Act from making a shared responsibility payment. There are multiple categories of exemptions. They include:
Short coverage gap
Religious conscience
Federally-recognized Native American nation
Income below income tax return filing requirement
The short coverage gap applies to individuals who lacked minimum essential coverage for less than three consecutive months during 2014. They will not be responsible for making a shared responsibility payment. Individuals who are members of a religious organization recognized as conscientiously opposed to accepting insurance benefits also are exempt from the individual mandate. Similarly, members of a federally-recognized Native American nation are exempt. If a taxpayer’s income is below the minimum threshold for filing a return, he or she is exempt from making a shared responsibility payment.
The IRS has developed new Form 8965, Health Coverage Exemptions. Taxpayers exempt from the individual mandate will file Form 8965 with their federal income tax return.
Shared responsibility payment
All other individuals - individuals without minimum essential coverage and who are not exempt - must make a shared responsibility payment when they file their 2014 return. For 2014, the payment amount is the greater of: One percent of the person’s household income that is above the tax return threshold for their filing status; or a flat dollar amount, which is $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, limited to a maximum of $285. The individual shared responsibility payment is capped at the cost of the national average premium for the bronze level health plan available through the Marketplace in 2014. Taxpayers will report the amount of their individual shared responsibility payment on their 2014 Form 1040.
The IRS has cautioned that it will offset a taxpayer’s refund if he or she fails to make a shared responsibility payment if required. However, the Affordable Care Act prevents the IRS from using its lien and levy authority to collect an unpaid shared responsibility payment.
Code Sec. 36B credit
Only individuals who obtain coverage through the Marketplace are eligible for the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has reported that more than two-thirds of Marketplace enrollees are eligible for the credit and many enrollees have received advance payment of the credit.
All advance payments of the credit must be reconciled on new Form 8962, which will be filed with the taxpayer’s income tax return. Taxpayers will calculate the actual credit they qualified for based on their actual 2014 income. If the actual premium tax credit is larger than the sum of advance payments made during the year, the individual will be entitled to an additional credit amount. If the actual credit is smaller than the sum of the advance payments, the individual’s refund will be reduced or the amount of tax owed will be increased, subject to a sliding scale of income-based repayment caps.
A change in circumstance, such as marriage or the birth/adoption of a child, could increase or decrease the amount of the credit. Individuals who are receiving an advance payment of the credit should notify the Marketplace of any life changes so the amount of the advance payment can be adjusted if necessary. Please contact our office if you have any questions about the Code Sec. 36B credit.
IRS officials have told Congress that the agency is ready for the new filings and reporting requirements. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
Lawmakers are scheduled to return to work after the November elections for the so-called "lame-duck" Congress. Despite what is expected to be a short session, there is likely to be movement on important tax bills.
Lawmakers are scheduled to return to work after the November elections for the so-called "lame-duck" Congress. Despite what is expected to be a short session, there is likely to be movement on important tax bills.
Tax extenders
Every two years, like clockwork, the same scenario seems to play-out in Congress. Many popular but temporary tax incentives expire and lawmakers debate whether to extend them, make them permanent or abolish them. This year is no exception. The new filing season is fast approaching and many tax breaks are, at this time, unavailable because they expired after 2013.
The expired tax breaks are known as "tax extenders." Included within this catch-call category are a variety of tax incentives for individuals and businesses. Some are widely-claimed and are often inadvertently believed by taxpayers to be permanent...they are not. Individuals who claimed the state and local sales tax deduction, higher education tuition deduction, residential energy property credit, and others, in past years cannot claim them on their 2014 returns, unless the incentives are extended. The same is true for many business tax breaks, such as bonus depreciation, enhanced Code Sec. 179 small business expensing and the research tax credit. All of these incentives expired after 2013.
Congressional logjam
The last extension of the extenders was in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. At that time, many lawmakers wanted to discontinue the practice of renewing the extenders every two years and make some permanent while eliminating others. However, the House and Senate have taken different approaches. The Senate Finance Committee approved the EXPIRE Act (S. 2260) earlier this year. The bill extends the expired tax breaks two years. The House, on the other hand, has voted to make permanent only some of the extenders, such as bonus depreciation and Code Sec. 179 expensing.
It is unclear how lawmakers will proceed before year-end. The EXPIRE Act, while approved by committee, has yet to get a vote on the Senate floor. House GOP leaders, who endorsed the piece-meal approach to making permanent some of the extenders, have not said if they will support another comprehensive temporary extension like the EXPIRE Act. It is possible that lawmakers will punt the extenders to the new Congress that meets in January. In that case, a delayed start to the filing season is almost guaranteed. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
More tax bills
Some stand-alone tax-related bills could be passed before year-end. The ABLE Act (S. 313) enjoys bipartisan support. The ABLE Act would create new tax-free savings accounts for individuals with disabilities. Funds in the accounts could be used for qualified medical, transportation, housing, and education expenses. The Don’t Forget Our Fallen Public Safety Heroes Act (S. 2912) passed the Senate in September and could be approved by the House before year-end. The bill would exclude from income certain benefits paid to the family of a public safety officer who dies in the line of duty.
IRS funding
The federal government, including the IRS, is currently operating under a stop-gap spending bill. The temporary spending bill is scheduled to expire in December. The lame-duck Congress is expected to approve an omnibus spending bill to keep the government open. Earlier this year, appropriators in the House and Senate reached very different conclusions on funding for the IRS in 2015. House appropriators voted to cut funding; Senate appropriators voted to increase funding. The IRS has been operating under tight budgetary restraints for several years and that pattern is expected to continue into 2015.
Tax technical corrections
Congress may also take up a package of tax technical corrections. These bills are not new tax laws but are corrections to language in existing laws. For example, lawmakers may have intended that a certain language be included in a final bill and that language was left out. Frequently, these corrections are clerical. These corrections are intended to facilitate the administration of law.
If you have any questions about the extenders or year-end tax legislation, please contact our office.
In certain cases, moving expenses may be tax deductible by individuals. Three key criteria must be satisfied: the move must closely-related to the start of work; a distance test must be satisfied and a time test also must be met.
In certain cases, moving expenses may be tax deductible by individuals. Three key criteria must be satisfied: the move must closely-related to the start of work; a distance test must be satisfied and a time test also must be met.
Closely-related to the start of work
The move must be closely-related to the start of work at a new location. Moving for non-work related reasons is not relevant. The closely-related requirement encompasses both a time threshold and a place threshold. The IRS has explained that closely-related in time generally means an individual can consider moving expenses incurred within one year from the date he or she first reported to work at the new location as closely related in time to the start of work. Closely-related in place generally means that the distance from the individual's new home to the new job location is not more than the distance from his or her former home to the new job location.
Distance
An individual's move satisfies the distance test if his or her new main location is at least 50 miles farther from his or her former home than the old main job location was from the former home. Note that the distance test takes into account only the location of the individual's former home. An individual's main job location is the location where he or she spends most of his or her working hours. Individuals may have more than one job. In that case, the IRS has explained that an individual's main job location depends on the facts in each case. Among the factors to take into account are the total time the individual spends at each place; the amount of work performed at each place and the amount of wages earned at each place. If an individual previously had no employment, or had experienced a period of unemployment, the new job location must be at least 50 miles from the individual's old home.
Time
Time for purposes of the moving deduction looks at an individual's hours of work and where that work is performed. An individual who is a wage earner (employed by another) must work full-time for at least 39 weeks during the first 12 months immediately following his or her arrival in the general area of the new job location. Self-employed individuals must work full time for at least 39 weeks during the first 12 months and for a total of at least 78 weeks during the first 24 months immediately following their arrival in the general area of the new work location.
Special rules apply to members of the U.S. Armed Forces as well as employees who are seasonal workers, individuals who have temporary absences from work, and others.
If you have any questions about the moving deduction, please contact our office.
The IRS continues to ramp-up its work to fight identity theft/refund fraud and recently announced new rules allowing the use of abbreviated (truncated) personal identification numbers and employer identification numbers. Instead of showing a taxpayer's full Social Security number (SSN) or other identification number on certain forms, asterisks or Xs replace the first five digits and only the last four digits appear. The final rules, however, do impose some important limits on the use of truncated taxpayer identification numbers (known as "TTINs").
The IRS continues to ramp-up its work to fight identity theft/refund fraud and recently announced new rules allowing the use of abbreviated (truncated) personal identification numbers and employer identification numbers. Instead of showing a taxpayer's full Social Security number (SSN) or other identification number on certain forms, asterisks or Xs replace the first five digits and only the last four digits appear. The final rules, however, do impose some important limits on the use of truncated taxpayer identification numbers (known as "TTINs").
Note. A TTIN typically appears as XXX-XX-1234 or ***-**-1234.
Identity theft/refund fraud
The IRS has more than 3,000 employees working identity-theft related issues. They are investigating refund fraud and assisting taxpayers - both individuals and businesses - that have been victims of identity theft. The IRS has also upgraded its filters that screen tax returns for indications of refund fraud. Between 2011 and 2014, the IRS reported that it prevented more than $50 billion in fraudulent refunds.
Protecting personal information from disclosure is one important tool in the IRS's toolshed to fight identity theft. IRS data systems contain personal information, such as SSNs, EINs, individual taxpayer identification numbers (ITINs) and adoption taxpayer identification numbers (ATINs) on millions of taxpayers. To thwart potential identity thieves, the agency launched a pilot program in 2009 to allow the use of TTINs. The goal of the pilot program was to reduce the risk of identity theft that could result from the inclusion of a taxpayer's entire identifying number on a payee statement or other document.
Proposed regulations
The IRS viewed the pilot program as a success and issued proposed regulations in 2013. Under the proposed regulations, TTINs would be available as an alternative to using a taxpayer's SSN, ITIN, or ATIN. The proposed regulations also permitted the use of TTINs to electronic payee statements as well as paper payee statements.
Expanded use
In July, the IRS announced that it was finalizing the proposed TTIN rules. The final rules also expand the use of TTINs to:
Employer identification numbers. The final rules allow the use of abbreviated employer identification numbers (EINs) in certain cases.
More documents. The final regulations permit the use of TTINs on any federal tax-related payee statement or other document required to be furnished to another person unless specifically prohibited.
Voluntary
The IRS encourages the use of TTINs but did not make use of TTINs mandatory. The IRS also explained that use of a TTIN will not result in any penalty for failure to include a correct taxpayer identifying number on any payee statement or other document.
Limitations
The final regulations (officially known as TD 9765) place some limits on TTINs. A TTIN may not be used on a return filed with the IRS. This includes Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. A TTIN also may not be used if a statute or regulation specifically requires use of an SSN, ITIN, ATIN, or EIN. Additionally, employers cannot use a TTIN on an employee's Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement.
If you have any questions about TTINs or identity theft/refund fraud, please contact our office.
U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial accounts must file an FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) if the aggregate value of their accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. The FBAR must be filed by June 30 of the current year to report the taxpayer's financial accounts for the prior year.
U.S. taxpayers with foreign financial accounts must file an FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) if the aggregate value of their accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. The FBAR must be filed by June 30 of the current year to report the taxpayer's financial accounts for the prior year.
A U.S. taxpayer must report the account not only if the taxpayer has a financial interest in the account, but also if the taxpayer has signature authority over the account. The account must be reported even if it produces no income, and whether or not the taxpayer receives any distributions from the account.
FinCEN
Reporting is required by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), not by the Internal Revenue Code. Taxpayers submit the proper form to Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), not the IRS. The form is not submitted with a tax return. However, FinCEN has delegated FBAR enforcement authority to the IRS.
New Form 114
In the past, taxpayers reported their accounts on Form TD F 90-22.1. However, effective for 2014 and subsequent years, taxpayers must report their accounts on new FinCEN Form 114. The June 30 deadline is firm; there is no extension for filing the form late. However, persons who belatedly discover the need to file an FBAR for a previous year can file on Form 114.
In the past, too, taxpayers reported their accounts on a paper form, but Form 114 is only available online, through the BSA E-Filing System website. Paper Form TD F 90-22.1 has been discontinued. This BSA E-Filing System allows the taxpayer to designate the year being reported, so taxpayers may use the same form to file late reports for a prior year. In addition, persons can now authorize a tax professional, such as an attorney, CPA, or enrolled agent, to file on their behalf, by designating an agent on BSA Form 114a.
If two persons jointly maintain an account, each must file an FBAR. However, spouses now qualify for an exception, and can file only one FBAR, provided the nonfiling spouse only owns accounts jointly with the filing spouse. The couple can complete a Form 114a, to authorize one spouse to file for the other, because the electronic system only accepts one signature for an FBAR.
Signature authority
Signature authority is authority to control the disposition of assets held in a foreign financial account. A person with a power of attorney over a foreign account must file an FBAR, even if the person never exercises the power of attorney.
FinCEN has considered amending the rules regarding signature authority. In the meantime, because there is some uncertainty about the meaning of signature authority, FinCEN has deferred FBAR filing by certain individuals that only have signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts of their employer or a closely related entity. FinCEN Notice 2011-1 first provided an extension for these persons. In Notice 2013-1, FinCEN extended the due date for these persons to file, to June 30, 2015, while FinCEN further considers changes to the rules.
One of the most complex, if not the most complex, provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the employer shared responsibility requirement (the so-called "employer mandate") and related reporting of health insurance coverage. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Obama administration has twice delayed the employer mandate and reporting. The employer mandate and reporting will generally apply to applicable large employers (ALE) starting in 2015 and to mid-size employers starting in 2016. Employers with fewer than 50 employees, have never been required, and continue to be exempt, from the employer mandate and reporting.
One of the most complex, if not the most complex, provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the employer shared responsibility requirement (the so-called "employer mandate") and related reporting of health insurance coverage. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, the Obama administration has twice delayed the employer mandate and reporting. The employer mandate and reporting will generally apply to applicable large employers (ALE) starting in 2015 and to mid-size employers starting in 2016. Employers with fewer than 50 employees, have never been required, and continue to be exempt, from the employer mandate and reporting.
Employer mandate
The employer mandate under Code Sec. 4980H and employer reporting under Code Sec. 6056 are very connected. Code Sec. 4980H generally provides that an ALE is required to pay a penalty if it fails to offer minimum essential coverage and any full-time employee receives cost-sharing or the Code Sec. 36B premium assistance tax credit. An ALE would also pay a penalty if it offers coverage and any full-time employee receives cost-sharing or the Code Sec. 36B credit.
To receive the Code Sec. 36B credit, an individual must have obtained coverage through an Affordable Care Act Marketplace. The Marketplaces will report the names of individuals who receive the credit to the IRS. ALEs must report the terms and conditions of health care coverage provided to employees (This is known as Code Sec. 6056 reporting). The IRS will use all of this information to determine if the ALE must pay a penalty.
ALEs
Only ALEs are subject to the employer mandate and must report health insurance coverage under Code Sec. 6056. Employers with fewer than 50 employees are never subject to the employer mandate and do not have to report coverage under Code Sec. 6056.
In February, the Obama administration announced important transition rules for the employer mandate that affects Code Sec. 6056 reporting. The Obama administration limited the employer mandate in 2015 to employers with 100 or more full-time employees. ALEs with fewer than 100 full-time employees will be subject to the employer mandate starting in 2016. At all times, employers with fewer than 50 full-time employees are exempt from the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting.
Reporting
The IRS has issued regulations describing how ALEs will report health insurance coverage. The IRS has not yet issued any of the forms that ALEs will use but has advised that ALEs generally will report the requisite information to the agency electronically.
ALEs also must provide statements to employees. The statements will describe, among other things, the coverage provided to the employee.
30-Hour Threshold
A fundamental question for the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting is who is a full-time employee. Since passage of the Affordable Care Act, the IRS and other federal agencies have issued much guidance to answer this question. The answer is extremely technical and there are many exceptions but generally a full-time employee means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week. The IRS has designed two methods for determining full-time employee status: the monthly measurement method and the look-back measurement method. However, special rules apply to seasonal workers, student employees, volunteers, individuals who work on-call, and many more. If you have any questions about who is a full-time employee, please contact our office.
Form W-2 reporting
The Affordable Care Act also requires employers to disclose the aggregate cost of employer-provided health coverage on an employee's Form W-2. This requirement is separate from the employer mandate and Code Sec. 6056 reporting. The reporting of health insurance costs on Form W-2 is for informational purposes only. It does not affect an employee's tax liability or an employer's liability for the employer mandate.
Shortly after the Affordable Care Act was passed, the IRS provided transition relief to small employers that remains in effect today. An employer is not subject the reporting requirement for any calendar year if the employer was required to file fewer than 250 Forms W-2 for the preceding calendar year. Special rules apply to multiemployer plans, health reimbursement arrangements, and many more.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about ALEs, the employer mandate or Code Sec. 6056 reporting.
The IRS's final "repair" regulations became effective January 1, 2014. The regulations provide a massive revision to the rules on capitalizing and deducting costs incurred with respect to tangible property. The regulations apply to amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property; every business is affected, especially those with significant fixed assets.
The IRS's final "repair" regulations became effective January 1, 2014. The regulations provide a massive revision to the rules on capitalizing and deducting costs incurred with respect to tangible property. The regulations apply to amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property; every business is affected, especially those with significant fixed assets.
Required and elective changes
There is a lot of work ahead for most taxpayers to comply with the new rules. There are three categories of changes under the regulations:
Changes that are required and are retroactive, with full adjustments under Code Sec. 481(a), in effect applying the regulations to previous years;
Required changes with modified or prospective Code Sec. 481(a) adjustment beginning in 2014; and
Elective changes that do not require any adjustments under Code Sec. 481.
Required changes with full adjustments include unit of property changes, deducting repairs (including the routine maintenance safe harbor), deducting dealer expenses that facilitate the sale of property, the optional method for rotable spare parts, capitalizing improvements and capitalizing certain acquisition or production costs. Elective changes can include capitalizing repair and maintenance costs of they are capitalized for financial accounting purposes.
Rev. Proc. 2014-16
The IRS issued Rev. Proc. 2014-16, granting automatic consent to taxpayers to change their accounting methods to comply with the final regulations. Rev. Proc. 2014-16 applies to all the significant provisions in the final regulations, such as repairs and improvements; materials and supplies, including rotable and temporary spare parts; and costs that have to be capitalized as improvements. Rev. Proc. 2014-16 supersedes Rev. Proc. 2012-19, which applied to changes made under the temporary and proposed repair regulations issued at the end of 2011.
There are 14 automatic method changes provided by Rev. Proc. 2014-16 for the repair regulations. Taxpayers may file for automatic consent on a single Form 3115, even if they are making changes in more than area. The normal scope limitations on changing accounting methods do not apply to a taxpayer making one or more changes for any tax year beginning before January 1, 2015. Scope changes would normally apply if the taxpayer is under examination, is in the final year of a trade or business, or is changing the same accounting method it changed in the previous five years.
Filing deadlines
For past years, taxpayers can apply the 2011 proposed and temporary (TD 9564) regulations or the 2013 final regulations to either 2012 or 2013, and can do this on a section-by-section basis. Taxpayers that decide to apply the final or temporary regulations to 2013 must file for an automatic change of accounting method (Form 3115) by September 15, 2014. Taxpayers applying the regulations to 2014 must file for an automatic change by September 15, 2015. (Both dates apply to calendar-year taxpayers.) The government has indicated it is unlikely to postpone the effective date of the regulations.
Dispositions
Rev. Proc. 2014-16 does not apply to dispositions of tangible property. The government issued reproposed regulations in this area (NPRM REG-110732-13). Although these regulations may not be finalized until later in 2014, the IRS expects to issue Rev. Proc. 2014-17 before then to allow taxpayers to make automatic accounting method changes under the proposed regulations. The procedure will provide some relief by allowing taxpayers to revoke general asset account elections that they made under the temporary regulations. No comments were submitted on these proposed regulations; it is likely the final regulations will not have any significant changes.